WE WRITE CUSTOM ACADEMIC PAPERS

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

Practice Issue and EvidenceSummary Guidelines

Practice Issue and EvidenceSummary Guidelines
CapstoneProject Milestone 1

Practice Issue and EvidenceSummary Guidelines

Purpose

Clear identification of the practice issue is the first step in evidence-based nursing. Next, the evidence is reviewed to determine the best intervention to change practice outcomes. Completion of the milestone will include identification of the practice issue using the ACE Star model of Knowledge Transformation and a review of the evidence that will support an intervention that will change outcomes. The evidence summary will be conducted through the ‘breaking down’ of a systematic review on your topic for your change project.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

· CO4: Develops and outlines a scientific, systematic decision-making process to integrate critical thinking with clinical judgment to assure safe and effective outcomes. (PO #4)

· CO8: Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #8)

Due Dates

Milestone #1 consists of the completion of two worksheets (Practice Issue Worksheet) and (Evidence Summary Worksheet). Submit the completed worksheets to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3.

Points

Milestone #1 is worth 175 points (75 points for the Practice Issue and 100 points for the Evidence Summary).

Practice Issue Worksheet Directions

Practice Issue Worksheet:
Read the guidelines including the grading rubrics below. You will use this worksheet to document the practice issue presented and approved by your instructor in the Week 2 Discussions.
i. Your practice issue will be the same for all three Milestone assignments in this course.

Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.
Evidence Summary Worksheet Directions

Evidence Summary Worksheet:
Read the guidelines including the grading rubrics below. You will use this worksheet to incorporate your evidence summary into your Week 4 Milestone 2 assignment.
b. Find a systematic review article in the Chamberlain library on your topic. Your Systematic Review Article must be peer-reviewed and include a narrative summary.

i. Go to the Chamberlain Library, click on RNBSN; NR451 Capstone course.You can find systematic reviews from many databases within the library, or by searching from the library homepage main search bar.

ii. To search, combine the phrase ‘systematic review’ with your topic using the Boolean search operator AND. For example, if you are looking for a systematic review on fall prevention, you would use this Boolean search phrase: systematic review AND fall prevention.

c. Type in your practice issue in the search tab; choose a systematic review article with a narrative summary to complete your worksheet.

Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.
Grading Criteria: Practice issue

Category

Points

%

Description

Practiceissue statement, scope of practice, practice area

20

27%

Identifies a Practice issue statement that is an independent nursing decision.

Describes the scope of practice issues.

Example: The number of falls in your facility has been increasing, especially during shift change.What do you believe may be causing this Are there any new interventions that could be put into place that would lessenor eliminatethe falls Thisis where you begin your initial searchinto the problem or practice issue identified.

Identifies the practice area.

Practice issue identification, rationale for selections

35

46%

Identifies how rationale behind how the practice issue was selectedas a practice issue/problem

Documents the practice issue in a logical manner.

Types of evidence to gather, rationale for selections

20

27%

Identifies and documents types of evidence that must be gathered for review of the Practice Issue.

Describesrationale for each type of evidence that is selected.

Total

75 points

100%

Grading Rubric: Practice Issue

Assignment Criteria

A (100%)

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B (88%)

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

C (80%)

Meets

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

NI (38%)

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

F (0%)

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Practiceissue statement, scope of practice, practice area

20 points

Practice issue is identified.

Practice issue is an independent nursing decision.

Scope of practice issue is fully described.

Practice area identified.

20 points

Practice Issue is identified but is not clear.

Practice issue is an independent nursing decision.

Scope of practice issue is described in simple terms.

Practice area identified.

18 points

Practice Issue is identified but is not clearly related to a nursing practice issue.

Practice Issue isnot an independent nursing decision.

Scope of practice issue is described but is not logical in comparison to Practice Issue described.

Practice area identified.

16 points

Practice Issue is unclear.

Practice Issueis not an independent nursing decision.

Scope of practice issue is not described.

Practice area identified.

8 points

Practice Issueisnot identified; practice issue is not an independent nursing decision; scope of practice issue is not described; practice area is not identified.

0 points

Practice issue identification, rationale for selections

35 points

Documents how the practice issue was identified.

Rationale for responses islogical anddescribed thoroughly.

35 points

Documents how the practice issue was identified.

Rationale for responses islogical and brieflydescribed.

33 points

Documents how the practice issue was identified.

Rationale for responses issomewhat logical and vaguely described.

30 points

Vaguely describes how the practice issue was identified.

Rationale for responses is somewhat logical and vaguely described.

15 points

Does not document how the practice issuewas identified.

Rationale is not completed.

This section of the form is blank.

0 points

Types of evidence to gather, rationale for selections

20 points

Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed for review.

Thoroughlydescribes rationale for all checked types of evidence selected.

20 points

Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed for review.

Briefly describes rationale for all checked types of evidence selected.

18 points

Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed but includes only a minimum description for rationale for selected evidence.

16 points

Does not document more than one type of evidence that is neededfor reviewand does not include rationale for selected type of evidence.

8 points

Does not document types of evidenceor rationale.

0 points

Total Points Possible = 75 points

Grading Criteria: Evidence Summary

Category

Points

%

Description

Practice Problem

10

10%

States practice problem in own words, with reference to the population, setting, and magnitude and in measurable terms.

Describes practice setting in measureable terms

Example: Consider the example given in the evidence summary above. The setting is the long term care facility where falls have been increasing and a trend has been identified that it seems to occur mainly during shift change.What do you believe may be causing this What can be done to lessen or eliminate the falls How does this number of falls relate to other months that have been tracked

Source of evidence

20

20%

Identifies a source of evidence that is a nursing topic that is the subject of a systematic review article.

Identifies search terms.

Provides a complete reference for the systematic review article.

Objectives of the article/Statement of questions

20

20%

Identifies the objectives of the article.

Identifies questions being addressed by author/s.

Explains relationship to your practice issue.

Interventions/Main findingssummary

30

30%

Summarizes, in own words, suggested interventions by the author/s to improve patient outcomes.

Summarizes main findings of the author/s including strength of evidence for each main outcome.

Describes the relevance to the Milestone 2 paper.

Evidence-based solutions and limitations

20

20%

Outlines evidence-based solutions to consider for the capstone project.

Discusses any limitations to the studies included in the systematic review that you believe may impact use of the evidence provided in your project.

Total

100 points

100%

Grading Rubric: Evidence Summary

Assignment Criteria

A (100%)

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B (88%)

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

C (80%)

Meets

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

NI (38%)

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

F (0%)

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Practice Problem

10 points

-Practice problem is in own words, with reference to the population of interest.

-Setting of the problem is identified

-Magnitudeof problem is discussed.

-The practice issue is stated in measurable terms.

Met all objectives as stated above

10 points

-Practice problem is in own words, with reference to the population of interest.

-Setting of the problem is not discussed.

-Magnitude of problem is discussed.

-The practice issue is stated in measurable terms.

Met 3 out of 4 objectives

9 points

-Practice problem is in own words, with reference to the population of interest.

-Setting of the problem is not discussed.

-Magnitude of problem is not discussed.

-The practice issue is stated in measurable terms.

Met 2 out of 4 objectives

8 points

-Practice problem is in own words, with reference to the population of interest.

-Setting of the problem is not discussed.

-Magnitude of problem is not discussed.

-The practice issue is stated but not measurable.

Met only 1 out of 4 objectives

4 points

-Practice problem is not in own words

-There are no references to the population of interest.

-Setting and magnitude of problem is not discussed

-The practice issue is not stated in measurable terms.

Did not meet any objectives

0 points

Source of evidence

20 points

-Source of evidence is nursing topic.

-Source is a Systematic Review article.

-Search terms are identified.

-Complete reference is given for Systematic Review article.

Metall 4 objectives as above

20 points

-Source of evidence is nursing topic.

-Source is a Systematic Review article.

-Search terms are identified.

-Complete reference is not given for Systematic Review article.

Met 3 out of 4 objectives

18 points

-Source of evidence is nursing topic.

-Source isnot a Systematic Review article.

-Search terms are identified.

-Complete reference is not given for Systematic Review article.

Met only 2 out of 2 objectives

16 points

-Source of evidence is not nursing topic.

-Source is a Systematic Review article.

-Search terms are not identified.

-Complete reference is not given for Systematic Review article.

Met only 1 out of 4 objectives

8 points

-Source of evidence is not nursing topic or Systematic Review article.

-Search terms are not identified.

-Reference is missing.

No objectives were met.

0 points

Objectives of the article/ Statement of questions

20 points

-Objectives of article are identified.

-Questions being addressed by author/s are thorough.

-Relationship to your practice issue is explained.

20 points

-Objectives of article are identified.

-Questions being addressed by author/s are explained but not thorough.

-Relationship to your practice issue is explained.

18 points

-Objectives of article are identified.

-Questions being addressed by author/s are not thorough.

-Relationship to your practice issue is vague.

16 points

-Objectives of article are identified.

-Questions being addressed by author/s is missing.

-Relationship to your practice issue is not explained.

8 points

-Objectives of article are not identified.

-Questions being addressed in article and relationship to own practice is not identified.

0 points

Interventions/ Main findings summary

30 points

-Thoroughly summarized (in their own words) the interventions the author(s) suggest to improve patient outcomes.

-Thoroughly summarized main findings of the author/s.

-Included strength of evidence for each main outcome.

30 points

-Briefly summarized (in their own words) the interventions the author(s) suggest to improve patient outcomes.

-Briefly summarized main findings of the author/s.

-Included strength of evidence for each main outcome.

27 points

-Vaguely summarized (in their own words) the interventions the author(s) suggest to improve patient outcomes.

-Vaguelysummarized main findings of the author/s.

-Included strength of evidence for most of main outcomes.

25 points

-Summary of interventions is not in own words.

-Summarized main findings of the author/s is not apparent.

-Did not include strength of evidence for any of the main outcome.

12 points

-Summary of the interventions the author(s) suggest to improve patient outcomes is missing.

-Summary of the main findings of the author is missing.

-The strength of the evidence for outcomes are missing.

0 points

Evidence-based solutions and limitations

20 points

-Outline of evidence-based solutions considered for project is documented and clear.

Discussed any limitations to the studies performed.

Documents limitations believed may impact use in project.

20 points

-Outline of evidence-based solutions being considered for project is documented but not clear.

Discussed any limitations to the studies performed.

Documents limitations believed may impact use in project.

18 points

-Outline of evidence-based solutions consideredfor project is documented but not clear.

Discussed most limitations to the studies performed.

Documents limitations believed may impact use in project.

16 points

-Outline of evidence-based solutions being considered for project is not documented.

-Discussed most limitations to the studies performed.

Documents limitations believed may impact use in project.

8 points

-Outline of evidence-based solutions, limitationsof studies and potential impact to project is missing.

0

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Instant Quote

Instant Quote
Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!