General 683 words

The Cherokees vs Andrew Jackson

Sample Essay

Andrew Jackson's presidency, from 1829 to 1837, is indelibly marked by his aggressive pursuit of Indian Removal, a policy that fundamentally reshaped the American South and precipitated immense suffering for its indigenous populations. Among the most prominent and tragically illustrative cases is that of the Cherokee Nation. Possessing a sophisticated written language, a republican form of government, and a significant agricultural and commercial economy, the Cherokee were far from the "savage" caricatures used to justify their displacement. Yet, driven by a potent combination of Southern land hunger, federal ambition, and a deeply ingrained belief in racial superiority, Jackson systematically dismantled treaty protections and legal defenses that the Cherokee had painstakingly built. The ultimate outcome was the forced removal of thousands of Cherokee people from their ancestral homelands in Georgia and surrounding states, a brutal episode often referred to as the Trail of Tears.

Jackson's animosity towards Native American sovereignty was evident from his early military career. As governor of the Michigan Territory and later as a general in the War of 1812, he had engaged in forceful dealings with various tribes. Upon entering the presidency, he found fertile ground for his removal agenda in the southeastern United States. Georgia, in particular, was a focal point. The state had long claimed ownership over lands inhabited by the Cherokee, and its legislature passed laws asserting state jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation, directly contravening federal treaties. Jackson, instead of upholding these federal obligations, actively supported Georgia's claims and encouraged the Cherokee to relocate west of the Mississippi River. His administration actively undermined Cherokee efforts to assimilate and demonstrate their capacity for self-governance, viewing their presence as an obstacle to westward expansion and economic development, particularly the lucrative cotton industry.

The Cherokee fought back through legal and political channels. They adopted a written constitution in 1827, modelled on the U.S. Constitution, and actively sought to assert their rights as a sovereign nation within federal law. A pivotal moment came with the Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia (1832). The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct political community with its own laws and boundaries, and that Georgia's laws had no force within Cherokee territory. This was a significant legal victory, seemingly affirming Cherokee sovereignty. However, Jackson famously defied the ruling, allegedly stating, "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it." His administration refused to intervene to protect the Cherokee from Georgia's encroaching laws and the illegal activities of white settlers, effectively rendering the Supreme Court's decision moot.

Despite the legal setback, a faction of the Cherokee Nation, led by figures like Major Ridge, Elias Boudinot, and John Ridge, came to believe that resistance was futile and that negotiating a removal treaty was the only way to preserve their people. This "Treaty Party" signed the Treaty of New Echota in 1835, which ceded Cherokee lands for $5 million and territory in present-day Oklahoma. The vast majority of the Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, vehemently denounced the treaty, arguing that the Treaty Party lacked the authority to represent the entire nation. Ross mobilized popular opposition, petitioning Congress and organizing resistance efforts. However, the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty in 1836 by a single vote, sealing the fate of the Cherokee.

The actual removal commenced in 1838, under President Martin Van Buren, Jackson's successor, who continued his predecessor's policies. General Winfield Scott was ordered to forcibly round up the Cherokee people. Soldiers, often accompanied by armed militias, swept through Cherokee settlements, burning homes, confiscating property, and forcing families at bayonet point into stockades. Over the next several months, thousands were marched westward under brutal conditions, with inadequate food, water, and shelter. Disease, starvation, and exhaustion claimed the lives of an estimated four thousand Cherokee men, women, and children – roughly a quarter of the nation's population – during this harrowing journey. The Trail of Tears stands as a stark indictment of Jacksonian Indian policy, a tragic consequence of a president’s unwavering commitment to dispossession and national expansion at the profound expense of human rights and justice.

Analysis

The essay effectively establishes a clear thesis in its introduction: Andrew Jackson's aggressive Indian Removal policy, fueled by expansionist desires and racial prejudice, led to the forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation, epitomized by the Trail of Tears. The structure follows a chronological and thematic progression, beginning with Jackson's broader policy, detailing Cherokee resistance through legal means, and culminating in the tragic events of the removal itself. Body paragraphs provide specific examples, such as the Worcester v. Georgia Supreme Court case and the Treaty of New Echota, demonstrating the Cherokee's sophisticated attempts at self-preservation and the federal government's persistent disregard for their rights. The tone is appropriately serious and critical, reflecting the gravity of the historical events.

Key Considerations

While the essay thoroughly details Jackson's role and the Cherokee plight, a deeper exploration of the economic motivations behind Georgia's land claims and the federal government's complicity might strengthen the analysis. For instance, elaborating on the economic boom associated with cotton cultivation in the region could provide more context for the intense pressure to acquire Cherokee lands. Additionally, while the Treaty of New Echota is presented as a key event, a more nuanced discussion of the internal divisions within the Cherokee Nation, beyond just the Treaty Party versus Ross, might add further depth. Exploring the varying perspectives and compromises attempted by different Cherokee factions could offer a more complex understanding of their internal dynamics during this crisis.

Recommendations

When writing your own essay, make sure your thesis is precise and argumentative, like the sample's focus on Jackson's "aggressive pursuit" and its consequences. Use specific historical figures, court cases (Worcester v. Georgia), and dates (1838 removal) to ground your claims, avoiding vague generalizations. Structure your essay logically, perhaps chronologically or thematically, ensuring smooth transitions between paragraphs. Maintain a consistent, analytical tone. Do not just describe events; explain their significance and connection to your thesis. Avoid overly emotional language; let the facts speak for themselves.

Frequently Asked Questions

Andrew Jackson's primary goal was the forced removal of Native American tribes, particularly those in the Southeast, from their ancestral lands to territories west of the Mississippi River, clearing the way for white settlement and expansion.

The Cherokee Nation used legal challenges, such as the Supreme Court case *Worcester v. Georgia*, adopted a written constitution, and engaged in political lobbying to assert their sovereignty and resist forced relocation.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct political community whose laws were applicable within its territory, invalidating Georgia's jurisdiction over Cherokee lands and affirming Cherokee sovereignty.

The Trail of Tears refers to the forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation in 1838, during which thousands died from disease, starvation, and exposure while being marched from their homelands to Indian Territory.

Need an original paper?

This sample is for study and inspiration. Get a custom, plagiarism-free essay written for you.

Order an Original Try the AI Humanizer