Literature & Books Case-study essay 680 words

Allegory and Morality in a Bekas Everyman Study

Sample Essay

The medieval morality play Everyman stands as a powerful allegorical exploration of human mortality and the reckoning with divine judgment. Through its stark narrative and personified characters, the play presents a compelling moral argument: salvation is achieved not through worldly possessions or fleeting pleasures, but through a sincere embrace of spiritual devotion and good deeds. The allegorical framework, where abstract concepts like Death, Fellowship, Kindred, Goods, and Good Deeds are given human form, makes the play's didactic purpose remarkably clear. Everyman's journey from his initial, fearful encounter with Death to his final acceptance by God, guided by the solitary figure of Good Deeds, illustrates the Christian belief in the necessity of spiritual preparation for the afterlife.

The play opens with the figure of Death, a stern messenger from God, commanding Everyman to make his final reckoning. This immediate confrontation with mortality is the catalyst for Everyman's desperate search for companionship and aid. His attempts to secure assistance from Fellowship, Kindred, and Cousin prove futile. These characters, representing the superficial bonds of social life, abandon Everyman when faced with the grim reality of death and the unknown of the afterlife. Fellowship offers to accompany him, but only until "the fire be at his back," highlighting the transient nature of earthly friendships. Kindred and Cousin, who should represent familial loyalty, are shown to be equally self-serving, offering only platitudes and excuses. This rejection by his closest earthly ties underscores the play's central moral: these worldly associations offer no true comfort or assistance in the face of eternal judgment.

Everyman's next recourse is to Goods, personifying material wealth. He hopes that his riches will intercede on his behalf. However, Goods, like Fellowship and Kindred, proves to be a fickle ally. It mocks Everyman, revealing its true nature as a source of corruption and a hindrance to spiritual advancement. Goods states that it "ever followed my pleasure" and "made many a rich man poor," directly linking material wealth with moral decay. This interaction reinforces the play's critique of materialism, asserting that earthly possessions are ultimately meaningless in the divine court. Everyman's realization that his wealth cannot save him marks a crucial turning point, forcing him to seek a more profound form of salvation.

The turning point in Everyman's spiritual journey arrives with the appearance of Good Deeds. Initially weak and frail, Good Deeds is presented as the embodiment of Everyman's virtuous actions throughout his life. She is accompanied by Knowledge, who acts as a confessor and guide, leading Everyman to repentance and a deeper understanding of his spiritual obligations. Knowledge instructs Everyman to seek out Good Deeds and to confess his sins. This process of confession and repentance, facilitated by Knowledge, strengthens Good Deeds, transforming her from a pitiable figure into a powerful advocate. The play emphasizes that true spiritual wealth lies not in accumulated possessions, but in a life lived in accordance with divine law, manifested through selfless actions and sincere contrition.

The final stages of Everyman's journey involve the allegorical figures of Discretion, Strength, Beauty, and Five Wits. These are faculties and qualities that Everyman initially believed would accompany him. However, as Everyman prepares to face Death and God, these figures begin to desert him, acknowledging their limitations in the face of eternity. Beauty fades, Strength wanes, and even Discretion and the Five Wits, while offering counsel, cannot provide the ultimate passage. This further emphasizes the play's moral that earthly attributes and intellectual capacities are insufficient for salvation. Only Good Deeds, personifying the sum of Everyman's virtuous life, remains with him. As Everyman descends into the grave, Good Deeds is the only one who can accompany him, promising to present him favorably to God. The play concludes with a Doctor's epilogue, explicitly stating the moral: "Remember ye well in any wise / How they that on the earth do lie in sin / And never will repent them for their sin / Go to hell, and never cry 'Amen.'" This direct address to the audience reinforces the play's didactic purpose, urging them to live righteous lives and prepare for the inevitable judgment.

Analysis

The essay effectively establishes its thesis in the introduction: Everyman uses allegory to teach that salvation comes through spiritual devotion and good deeds, not worldly possessions. The structure follows Everyman's allegorical journey logically, dedicating body paragraphs to key encounters: Death, Fellowship/Kindred/Goods, and the crucial intervention of Good Deeds. The use of evidence is strong, drawing directly from the play's characters and their dialogue to support claims about the transient nature of earthly ties and the ultimate value of virtue. For instance, the essay quotes Goods's self-incriminating statement to illustrate its corrupting influence. The tone is appropriately academic and analytical, maintaining a formal distance while conveying the play's moral urgency.

Key Considerations

While the essay provides a solid overview, it could benefit from a deeper exploration of the theological underpinnings of the play. For example, discussing the medieval Catholic emphasis on confession and sacraments as pathways to grace, beyond just "good deeds," would add nuance. The essay also focuses heavily on the negative allegorical figures; a more detailed analysis of the positive allegorical figures like Knowledge and the strengthened Good Deeds could further illuminate the path to salvation presented in the play. An alternative angle could be to compare Everyman's allegorical method with other medieval morality plays, highlighting its unique strengths or commonalities.

Recommendations

When adapting this for your own essay, ensure your thesis is clearly stated early on. Structure your argument chronologically or thematically, mirroring the play's progression or thematic concerns. Use specific quotes from the text to support every point you make about characters or their actions; don't just summarize. Maintain a formal, analytical tone throughout, avoiding casual language. Avoid simply recounting the plot; focus on interpreting the allegorical meanings and moral implications. Remember to connect your analysis back to your main thesis regularly.

Frequently Asked Questions

The play's central allegory is the journey of Everyman towards death and divine judgment, where characters like Fellowship, Goods, and Good Deeds represent abstract concepts related to worldly life and spiritual worth.

The play teaches that true salvation is achieved through sincere repentance, virtuous actions (Good Deeds), and spiritual devotion, rather than through material wealth or superficial relationships.

Death is personified as God's messenger, an unavoidable and solemn figure who compels Everyman to confront his mortality and prepare for his final reckoning.

They abandon Everyman because their allegorical nature represents fleeting worldly pleasures and possessions, which are ultimately useless and irrelevant when facing divine judgment and the afterlife.