Literature & Books 658 words

The Creature of Mary Shelley S Frankenstein

Sample Essay

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein presents a tragic figure in the Creature, whose monstrous appearance belies a profound initial innocence. Far from being born evil, the Creature is a being of immense potential, capable of empathy and a deep yearning for connection. His descent into violence and despair is not a predetermined fate but a direct consequence of his creator’s abandonment and the unremitting prejudice he encounters from humanity. Through the Creature’s experiences, Shelley crafts a potent critique of societal failure, arguing that true monstrosity lies not in physical form but in the cruelty and fear that humans inflict upon those they deem ‘other’.

Upon his animated awakening, the Creature is immediately confronted with horror – not at himself, but at the revulsion his appearance inspires. Victor Frankenstein, his creator, recoils in disgust, abandoning his newly sentient creation to a world that offers no solace. This initial rejection sets a devastating precedent. The Creature’s early days are marked by observation and a desperate attempt to understand human society. He learns language, observes familial bonds from afar through the De Lacey family, and even experiences profound empathy, weeping at their misfortunes. His desire for companionship is pure and deeply human. He believes that if he can demonstrate his benevolent intentions, he will be accepted. His self-education, undertaken in secret, reveals a sharp intellect and a capacity for moral reasoning, evidenced by his reading of Plutarch's Lives, Goethe's The Sorrows of Young Werther, and Paradise Lost. He identifies with Adam, but more powerfully, with Satan, seeing in the fallen angel a fellow outcast rejected by his creator.

However, the Creature's hopes are systematically dashed. His attempts to interact with humans are met with fear and violence. The villagers attack him, and even the kindly De Laceys, whom he had come to regard as a potential source of acceptance, are terrified and drive him away when they discover his appearance. This relentless ostracism hardens the Creature’s heart. The rejection is not merely social; it is a denial of his very existence and his right to exist. He begins to internalize the world's judgment, and the pain of isolation transforms his innate desire for love into a burning rage. He recognizes that his physical form is an insurmountable barrier to happiness, a cruel cosmic joke played by a creator who denied him not only love but also any chance of acceptance.

The Creature’s subsequent actions, while horrific, can be understood as a desperate and misguided response to profound suffering. He targets Victor’s loved ones, Elizabeth and Clerval, not out of inherent malice, but to inflict upon Victor the same agony of loss and loneliness he has endured. His demand for a female companion is a plea for an end to his eternal solitude, a hope for a being who might not be repulsed by him. When Victor agrees, only to destroy the female creature, it represents the ultimate betrayal and the extinguishment of any remaining hope. This act solidifies the Creature’s belief that he is doomed to perpetual misery and that his creator is the source of all his pain. His final pursuit of Victor to the Arctic is not a hunt for sport, but a desperate chase for justice, a demand for his creator to witness the full extent of his suffering and take responsibility for the life he so carelessly brought into being and so cruelly abandoned.

Ultimately, Shelley uses the Creature’s tragic trajectory to question the foundations of morality and prejudice. The novel suggests that monstrosity is a construct, a label applied to that which is different and feared. The Creature’s initial disposition was not monstrous; it was the relentless cruelty and fear of society, spearheaded by his own creator, that sculpted him into the vengeful being he becomes. His story serves as a powerful indictment of a society that judges by appearance and punishes difference, highlighting the devastating consequences of unchecked prejudice and the moral imperative of compassion and responsibility.

Analysis

The essay effectively argues that Frankenstein's Creature is a victim of societal failure and abandonment, not inherent evil. The thesis is clear and well-supported throughout. The structure progresses logically, beginning with the Creature's innocent birth, detailing his attempts at connection, his subsequent rejection, and culminating in his vengeful actions as a consequence of that rejection. The use of evidence is strong, referencing the Creature's self-education, his empathetic observations of the De Laceys, his identification with figures from Paradise Lost, and his specific acts of revenge. The analysis of these points effectively links them back to the central argument about societal prejudice. The tone is analytical and empathetic towards the Creature, presenting him as a tragic figure rather than a pure antagonist.

Key Considerations

While the essay compellingly argues for the Creature's victimization, a more nuanced exploration could consider the extent to which the Creature also exercises agency in his choices. The essay focuses heavily on external factors; a stronger version might more deeply analyze the Creature's internal moral deliberations and the philosophical implications of his decision to embrace vengeance. Furthermore, while the critique of society is powerful, a deeper dive into Victor's own psychological failings as a contributor to the Creature's plight, beyond mere abandonment, could offer additional layers. The conclusion could also more explicitly connect the novel's themes to contemporary issues of prejudice and social responsibility.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on grounding your arguments in specific textual examples. Instead of saying "he felt sad," describe how the text shows his sadness (e.g., "he wept at their misfortunes"). Ensure your thesis is precise and guides your entire argument. Avoid simply summarizing plot points; instead, analyze why those events are significant to your main argument. Use transitional phrases naturally to connect ideas, rather than relying on formulaic signposting like "firstly" or "in conclusion." Maintain a consistent, analytical tone throughout.

Frequently Asked Questions

The essay argues that the Creature is not inherently evil. His initial state is one of innocence and a desire for connection, with his later actions stemming from abandonment and societal rejection.

He learns through keen observation of human life, particularly the De Lacey family, and through extensive reading of books like *Paradise Lost* and *The Sorrows of Young Werther*.

The relentless prejudice and violence he faces from humanity, coupled with his creator's abandonment, fuel his desire for revenge as a way to inflict his suffering onto Victor.

The Creature's story highlights the destructive nature of prejudice, the importance of compassion, and argues that societal failures can create the very "monsters" they fear.