Literature & Books 671 words

Who Is the Real Monster in Frankenstein

Sample Essay

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has long prompted readers to question the nature of monstrosity. While the Creature, with its grotesque appearance and violent acts, seems the obvious candidate, a closer examination of Victor Frankenstein's character and actions reveals a far more insidious form of evil. Victor's ambition, his profound irresponsibility, and his relentless pursuit of vengeance ultimately make him the true monster in Shelley's enduring novel, far surpassing the suffering and misdeeds of his animated creation.

Victor's initial transgression is driven by an unchecked ambition, a desire to transcend human limitations and play God. His obsession with unlocking the secrets of life leads him to neglect every other facet of his existence, including his family, his studies, and his own well-being. He describes his work with a feverish intensity: "I pursued nature to her hiding-places... I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation." This singular focus blinds him to the ethical implications of his endeavor. When the Creature is finally animated, Victor's reaction is not one of awe or paternal concern, but of immediate horror and disgust. He abandons his creation the moment it opens its eyes, an act of profound cruelty that sets the stage for all subsequent tragedies. This abandonment is not merely a momentary lapse; it is a fundamental abdication of responsibility. He created life but refused to guide it, nurture it, or even acknowledge it.

The Creature's subsequent descent into violence is a direct consequence of this initial abandonment and the subsequent rejection he faces from humanity. Initially, the Creature is benevolent, observing the De Lacey family with a longing for connection and understanding. He learns language, compassion, and the nuances of human society from afar. His first instinct is to seek companionship, not violence. However, every attempt he makes at peaceful integration is met with fear and revulsion, culminating in the brutal rejection by the De Laceys themselves. This consistent ostracism, stemming from his appearance, fuels his despair and rage. He articulates this clearly to Victor: "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again become virtuous." His acts of vengeance, while horrific, are born out of a profound sense of injustice and a desperate, unfulfilled need for acceptance.

Conversely, Victor’s monstrosity is characterized by a conscious, ongoing choice to prioritize his own emotional comfort and reputation over the well-being of others. After his initial abandonment, he refuses to acknowledge his role in the Creature's actions. He blames the Creature entirely, conveniently forgetting the circumstances of its birth. When William is murdered, Victor suspects his creation but does not immediately confess his own culpability in its existence. Later, when the Creature demands a female companion, Victor agrees, but then destroys the second creation out of fear. This decision, he claims, is for the good of humanity, but it is underscored by his own fear and his inability to confront the consequences of his initial act. He fears the potential offspring of his creations, yet he created the very possibility of such a scenario. This moral cowardice and self-serving justification mark him as a figure of deep-seated corruption. His final pursuit of the Creature across the Arctic is not a noble quest for justice, but a desperate, all-consuming obsession for revenge, a perversion of his original scientific drive.

Ultimately, Victor Frankenstein embodies the true monster because his sins are born not of ignorance or innate malevolence, but of a deliberate abdication of moral duty and a pervasive selfishness. He possesses the capacity for empathy and reason, which he consistently chooses to ignore. The Creature, on the other hand, is a victim of circumstance, his monstrosity a product of the cruelty and prejudice he encounters. While his actions are undeniable, they are a reaction to the profound suffering inflicted upon him by his creator and society. Victor’s ambition blinds him, his fear paralyzes him, and his revenge consumes him, demonstrating that the most terrifying monsters are often those who walk among us, cloaked in the guise of humanity.

Analysis

The essay presents a clear thesis: Victor Frankenstein, not his Creature, is the true monster. This is established in the introduction and consistently supported throughout the body paragraphs. The structure flows logically, moving from Victor’s initial ambition and abandonment to the Creature's resulting suffering and violent acts, and finally contrasting Victor's continued irresponsibility and self-deception with the Creature's reactive malice. Evidence is drawn from the novel’s plot points and character motivations, such as Victor's description of his work, the Creature's plea for a companion, and Victor's destruction of the second creation. The tone is analytical and persuasive, aiming to convince the reader of its central argument.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively argues for Victor as the primary monster, it could explore the nuances of the Creature's agency more deeply. For instance, did the Creature have a point of no return earlier than the rejection by the De Laceys? Furthermore, a stronger version might dedicate more space to analyzing the societal prejudice that Victor himself perpetuates, even before the Creature's actions, as another facet of his monstrousness. An alternative angle could also explore the idea of collective monstrosity, where both creator and creation, alongside the prejudiced society, share responsibility.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, students should ensure their thesis is similarly clear and focused. Avoid simply summarizing the plot; instead, analyze characters' motivations and actions to support your argument. Use specific examples and direct quotes sparingly but effectively to illustrate points. Pay attention to transitions between paragraphs to ensure a smooth flow of ideas. Don't shy away from strong claims, but ensure they are well-substantiated by textual evidence. Ensure a consistent analytical tone.

Frequently Asked Questions

The creator of Frankenstein's monster is Victor Frankenstein, a young Swiss scientist driven by ambition to create life.

The Creature is considered a monster due to its terrifying appearance and the violent acts it commits, including murder, in response to rejection.

The essay argues Victor is the real monster because of his ambition, his abandonment and irresponsibility towards his creation, and his subsequent self-deception and pursuit of vengeance.

No, the essay acknowledges the Creature's violent acts but frames them as reactive consequences of suffering and rejection, contrasting them with Victor's deliberate moral failures.