Literature & Books 598 words

Who Is the True Monster in Frankenstein

Sample Essay

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein presents a chilling exploration of creation, responsibility, and the very definition of monstrosity. While the Creature, a grotesque being cobbled together from human remains, is the obvious physical manifestation of horror, a closer examination of the narrative reveals that Victor Frankenstein, his creator, bears a far greater culpability for the ensuing tragedy. Victor's hubris, his abject abandonment of his creation, and his subsequent refusal to acknowledge his moral obligations transform him from a well-intentioned scientist into the story's true monster.

Victor's descent into monstrousness begins with his obsessive pursuit of knowledge. Driven by an insatiable desire to unlock the secrets of life, he isolates himself, neglecting his family, friends, and studies. His ambition blinds him to the ethical implications of his work, reducing living beings to mere components for his grand experiment. This selfish pursuit culminates in the animation of his creation. However, upon witnessing the grotesque reality of his work – the yellow skin, the watery eyes, the shriveled complexion – Victor recoils not with paternal concern, but with utter horror and disgust. He flees his laboratory, abandoning the newly sentient being to a world that will inevitably reject it based on its appearance. This act of abandonment is the foundational sin, a profound betrayal of the creator's duty to his creation.

The Creature, initially a tabula rasa, is thrust into existence with no guidance, no language, and no social context. His early experiences are marked by fear and rejection. He attempts to connect with humanity, observing the De Lacey family with longing and learning language through their interactions and by secretly reading books like Plutarch's Lives and Milton's Paradise Lost. These experiences cultivate in him a deep yearning for acceptance and companionship. His plea to Victor for a female companion, a creature like himself, stems not from malice, but from a desperate need for solace and an end to his crushing solitude. Victor’s refusal, driven by fear of a new species of monster, is another critical failure of empathy and responsibility. He prioritizes his own anxieties over the profound suffering of the being he brought into existence, sealing the Creature's fate and, by extension, the fate of his loved ones.

Victor’s subsequent actions only serve to deepen his monstrous character. Instead of taking responsibility for the Creature’s actions, which are a direct consequence of his abandonment, Victor dedicates himself to hunting his creation. This pursuit becomes an all-consuming obsession, mirroring his earlier scientific ambition but devoid of any constructive purpose. He allows his grief and thirst for revenge to overshadow any semblance of moral reasoning. He fails to understand that the Creature’s violence is a product of his own neglect, a desperate lashing out against a world that has shown him nothing but cruelty. His narrative, filtered through his own self-pity and justification, presents a skewed perspective that consistently deflects blame.

Ultimately, the true monstrousness lies not in the Creature’s physical appearance, but in Victor’s moral failings. The Creature’s actions, though horrific, are born from a deep-seated pain and a yearning for connection that his creator denied him. Victor, on the other hand, acts out of pride, fear, and a profound lack of empathy. He has the capacity for reason and morality, yet he consistently chooses the path of irresponsibility and vengeance. His scientific ambition, unchecked by ethical consideration, leads to the creation of suffering, and his subsequent refusal to mitigate that suffering solidifies his position as the story's central villain. Victor Frankenstein, the creator who abandons his progeny and unleashes a tide of misery, is the true monster of Shelley's enduring novel.

Analysis

The essay effectively argues that Victor Frankenstein, not his creation, is the true monster. The thesis is clearly stated in the introduction and consistently supported throughout the body paragraphs. The structure is logical, moving from Victor's initial hubris and abandonment to the Creature's suffering and Victor's subsequent failures. Specific examples, such as the Creature observing the De Lacey family and reading specific books, and Victor's fear of a new species, provide concrete evidence. The tone is analytical and persuasive, maintaining a consistent focus on culpability. The essay uses the narrative structure of the novel to build its case, contrasting the Creature's innate desires with Victor's deliberate choices.

Key Considerations

While the essay makes a strong case, one could consider the Creature's agency. Though his actions are fueled by suffering, his choices to inflict harm are still his own. A more nuanced argument might explore the degrees of responsibility, acknowledging Victor's primary role while still interrogating the Creature's capacity for violence. Furthermore, the concept of "monstrosity" could be explored more broadly, perhaps touching on societal prejudice as a contributing factor to the Creature's fate, rather than solely focusing on Victor's individual actions. Examining the Creature's internal monologue and his rationalizations for his violent acts could offer alternative perspectives on his own perceived monstrosity.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, ensure your thesis is clear and directly answers the prompt. Use specific textual evidence from Frankenstein to support each point—don't just summarize plot. Vary your sentence structure to keep the reader engaged. Avoid making broad generalizations; instead, explain how Victor's actions demonstrate monstrosity and why the Creature's actions, though terrible, stem from his experiences. Don't be afraid to use contractions for a more natural flow, but maintain a formal academic tone. Resist the urge to simply restate the prompt in your introduction or conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions

While the Creature is a victim of abandonment and prejudice, his later actions, such as murder, demonstrate agency and a capacity for malice, complicating a purely victimhood narrative.

Victor is driven by an obsessive desire to unlock the secrets of life and achieve scientific glory, rather than a benevolent or responsible intention to bring forth a new being.

The Creature learns by secretly observing the De Lacey family, listening to their conversations, and by reading books he finds, such as Plutarch's *Lives* and *Paradise Lost*.

No, Shelley deliberately complicates the notion of monstrosity, suggesting that it can be both physical and moral, and that blame is not always straightforward.