Media & Arts Analysis essay 630 words

103 Movie Analysis Essay Example

Sample Essay

Orson Welles's 1941 masterpiece, Citizen Kane, stands as a landmark in cinematic history not only for its technical innovations but also for its radical approach to storytelling. The film eschews a linear chronology, instead presenting the life of Charles Foster Kane through a mosaic of fragmented memories and perspectives from those who knew him. This deliberate narrative disruption, centered on the enigmatic final word, "Rosebud," serves to underscore the inherent subjectivity of biography and the impossibility of truly grasping a person's essence. Through its non-linear structure, shifting viewpoints, and symbolic imagery, Citizen Kane argues that understanding a life is a process of piecing together incomplete, often contradictory, narratives.

The film's fragmented structure is introduced from its opening moments. We are not immediately presented with Kane's life story but rather his death, a lonely, desolate scene in the palatial Xanadu. The reporter Jerry Thompson is then tasked with uncovering the meaning of Kane's dying word, "Rosebud." This quest propels the narrative, but instead of a straightforward investigation, Thompson interviews a series of Kanes's former associates: his guardian, Walter Parks Thatcher; his business rival, Mr. Bernstein; his best friend, Jedediah Leland; and his second wife, Susan Alexander Kane. Each interview reveals a different facet of Kane's character and a different period of his life, but none offers a definitive answer to "Rosebud" or a complete picture of the man. The film’s structure mirrors the detective genre, yet it subverts the genre's promise of a singular truth. Instead, it highlights how memory is selective and prone to bias, making the pursuit of a unified biography ultimately futile.

Furthermore, Citizen Kane employs a deliberately subjective point-of-view, emphasizing how each narrator's perception of Kane is shaped by their personal experiences and relationship with him. Thatcher, a stern banker, views Kane as an irresponsible child whose idealism must be curbed. Bernstein, Kane's loyal business manager, remembers Kane's early triumphs and his charismatic leadership with a rose-tinted nostalgia. Jedediah Leland, the disillusioned drama critic and Kane's lifelong friend, offers a more critical and perhaps painful account, detailing Kane's descent into arrogance and self-absorption. Susan Alexander, Kane's second wife, portrays him as a domineering figure who attempts to mold her into a singer despite her lack of talent, ultimately trapping her in a gilded cage. Welles masterfully uses these divergent accounts to show how Kane is not a fixed entity but a constellation of impressions, each valid within its own context yet incomplete on its own. The camera often reflects this subjectivity, lingering on the faces of the interviewees, their expressions and body language conveying as much about their memories as their words.

The film culminates in Thompson's failure to uncover the definitive meaning of "Rosebud" and his subsequent abandonment of the investigation. He concludes that no single word can encapsulate a man's life, a sentiment echoed by Bernstein, who states, "Mr. Kane was a man who got up in the morning and went to bed at night. What he did between those times, that's his own business." This final resignation is crucial. The audience, however, has been privy to a secret the characters have missed: the true identity of "Rosebud" is revealed in a brief, almost throwaway shot of a child's sled being burned in Xanadu's furnace. This sled represents Kane's lost childhood, the innocence he abandoned in his relentless pursuit of power and influence. By withholding this key piece of information until the end and from the characters themselves, Welles reinforces the film's central thesis. We, the viewers, are given a more complete understanding than any of the characters, yet even this understanding is presented as a final, private revelation, not a shared truth. Citizen Kane thus demonstrates that while a life can be documented, its true meaning remains elusive, a collection of echoes and fragments.

Analysis

The essay presents a clear thesis: Citizen Kane's fragmented narrative and subjective viewpoints demonstrate the impossibility of fully grasping an individual's essence. This thesis is well-supported by specific examples drawn directly from the film. The body paragraphs effectively analyze the narrative structure, detailing the use of flashbacks and multiple interviewees to present Kane's life non-chronologically. The discussion of subjective viewpoints highlights how characters like Thatcher, Bernstein, Leland, and Susan Alexander offer contrasting and biased interpretations of Kane, illustrating the film's argument about memory. The conclusion effectively reiterates the thesis, particularly by referencing the final reveal of "Rosebud" and its symbolic significance, reinforcing the film's exploration of fragmented understanding. The tone is analytical and academic, maintaining a consistent focus on cinematic technique and thematic interpretation.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively analyzes Citizen Kane's narrative structure and thematic implications, it could benefit from a deeper exploration of Welles's visual style and its contribution to the film's themes. For instance, the use of deep focus cinematography and chiaroscuro lighting, particularly in scenes at Xanadu, could be linked more explicitly to Kane's isolation and the obscured nature of his true self. Additionally, a more detailed comparison of the different narrative voices, perhaps examining the editing techniques used to transition between them, might further strengthen the analysis of subjectivity. The essay also touches on "Rosebud" as a symbol but could expand on the specific emotional resonance it holds for the audience versus the characters.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on concrete examples. Instead of saying "the film uses flashbacks," specify which flashback and what it reveals about Kane. Use strong topic sentences for each paragraph that clearly state the point you'll be proving. Avoid vague statements; if you mention a character's perspective, explain why it's biased. Ensure your conclusion doesn't just summarize but offers a final insight that builds on your thesis. Don't be afraid to use film-specific terminology, but explain it if it's complex. Be wary of simply recounting plot points; always tie them back to your analytical argument.

Frequently Asked Questions

The essay argues that *Citizen Kane*'s non-linear structure and multiple perspectives reveal the subjective and fragmented nature of understanding a person's life, suggesting complete truth is unattainable.

It supports the thesis by analyzing the film's use of flashbacks, contrasting character testimonies (like Thatcher's and Bernstein's), and the symbolic meaning of "Rosebud" to illustrate fragmented memory.

The essay focuses on the narrative structure, specifically the fragmented chronology and shifting points of view, as the primary techniques supporting its thematic argument.

"Rosebud" represents Kane's lost childhood innocence, a symbol revealed to the audience but missed by the characters, underscoring the film's theme that a complete understanding of a life remains elusive.

Need an original paper?

This sample is for study and inspiration. Get a custom, plagiarism-free essay written for you.

Order an Original Try the AI Humanizer