Media & Arts Review essay 534 words

The Greatest Showman Movie Review

Sample Essay

The Greatest Showman, released in 2017, presents itself as a vibrant celebration of P.T. Barnum's life and the birth of show business. While the film undeniably succeeds in delivering breathtaking musical numbers and a visually spectacular experience, its narrative often prioritizes dazzling spectacle over historical accuracy and nuanced character development. The thesis of this review is that The Greatest Showman, despite its undeniable entertainment value and compelling musical core, ultimately falls short as a substantive historical portrayal due to its romanticized depiction of Barnum and its glossing over of the ethical complexities inherent in his ventures.

The film's greatest strength lies in its musical score and choreography. Songs like "This Is Me" and "A Million Dreams" are not just catchy; they are anthems that capture the film's core themes of self-acceptance and the pursuit of dreams. The opening number, "The Greatest Show," immediately immerses the audience in Barnum's world, a whirlwind of color and energy. The choreography is dynamic, blending traditional musical theatre with more contemporary styles, and the performances, particularly Hugh Jackman's charismatic portrayal of Barnum and Keala Settle's powerful rendition of "This Is Me," are consistently strong. These musical sequences are undeniably the engine of the film, driving its emotional impact and visual appeal.

However, the film's depiction of P.T. Barnum himself is heavily sanitized. The historical Barnum was a complex, often unscrupulous figure, a showman whose business practices frequently bordered on exploitation. The film presents him as a benevolent visionary, driven by a desire to create wonder and provide a haven for the ostracized. His early struggles and his subsequent rise are portrayed with a romantic gloss that conveniently omits the more questionable aspects of his career. For instance, while the film touches upon his exhibition of individuals with physical differences, it frames this as an act of empowerment and inclusion for them, rather than acknowledging the significant ethical debates surrounding such practices at the time. This narrative choice, while making for a more palatable and uplifting story, sacrifices historical integrity for idealized heroism.

Furthermore, the film's exploration of social issues, while present, often feels superficial. The prejudice faced by the "oddities" in Barnum's circus is depicted, but the resolution often relies on Barnum's success rather than a deeper societal shift. The romance between Charity Barnum and P.T. Barnum, for example, is presented as a fairy tale, downplaying the societal barriers they actually faced. Similarly, the integration of Jenny Lind, the "Swedish Nightingale," into Barnum's American circus is portrayed as a simple business transaction, overlooking the potential exploitation of Lind herself and the financial risks Barnum took. These elements, while serving the plot, lack the depth required to fully grapple with the societal dynamics of the 19th century.

In conclusion, The Greatest Showman is a film that prioritizes entertainment and inspirational messaging above all else. Its musical numbers are spectacular, its performances are engaging, and its themes of ambition and acceptance resonate. Yet, its unwavering commitment to portraying P.T. Barnum as an unblemished hero and its superficial engagement with the ethical and social complexities of his era prevent it from being a truly compelling or historically accurate account. It is a dazzling spectacle, a triumphant musical, but a flawed historical drama.

Analysis

The essay effectively establishes a clear thesis in its introduction: The Greatest Showman is a visually stunning musical but falls short as a historical portrayal due to its romanticized depiction of Barnum and glossing over ethical issues. The body paragraphs are well-structured, dedicating distinct sections to the film's strengths (music and performance) and its weaknesses (historical inaccuracy and superficial social commentary). Specific examples like "This Is Me," "A Million Dreams," and the portrayal of Jenny Lind are used to support these points. The tone is critical but fair, acknowledging the film's entertainment value while consistently returning to the central argument about its historical shortcomings.

Key Considerations

A potential weakness lies in the essay's focus on historical accuracy. While valid, one could argue that the film is more of a biographical musical fantasy than a documentary, and its primary aim is emotional resonance and entertainment. A different angle might explore the film's effectiveness as a modern musical, analyzing how its themes of inclusivity and ambition translate to contemporary audiences, regardless of historical fidelity. The essay could also delve deeper into the visual storytelling and the directorial choices that contribute to the film's overall impact, beyond just the musical numbers.

Recommendations

For students adapting this review, remember to integrate your thesis seamlessly into the introduction. When providing evidence, be specific; instead of saying "the film shows prejudice," name a character or scene that illustrates it. Avoid vague praise or criticism; explain why a musical number is effective or how a historical portrayal is inaccurate. Ensure your conclusion doesn't just summarize but offers a final evaluative thought that reinforces your thesis. Don't be afraid to use strong, evaluative language, but maintain an objective, analytical tone throughout.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary criticism is that the film romanticizes P.T. Barnum's life and business practices, glossing over ethical complexities and historical inaccuracies for the sake of an uplifting narrative.

The review highly praises the film's spectacular musical numbers, energetic choreography, and strong performances, particularly Hugh Jackman's.

No, it acknowledges the film's undeniable entertainment value and its success as a musical, but argues that its flaws lie in its historical portrayal and thematic depth.

The essay points out that the film sanitizes Barnum, presenting him as a benevolent hero while omitting the exploitative nature of some of his ventures and exhibitions.