Politics & Government 684 words

Chester a Arthur the Accidental President Who Left a Mark

Sample Essay

The corridors of American history are often shaped by figures who ascend to the highest office through deliberate ambition and calculated maneuvering. Chester A. Arthur, however, represents a distinct anomaly. Thrust into the presidency following the assassination of James A. Garfield in September 1881, Arthur was a product of the very political machine he would later seek to reform. His background as a spoilsman, deeply entrenched in New York Republican politics, led many to anticipate a presidency of continued patronage and limited progress. Yet, Arthur defied these low expectations, presiding over a period of significant administrative and civil service reform that left a more lasting mark than many expected from a president who never sought the office. Arthur’s unexpected legacy stems primarily from his championing of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883, a landmark piece of legislation that fundamentally altered the nature of federal employment and began to dismantle the entrenched spoils system.

The Pendleton Act was a direct response to the public outcry following Garfield’s assassination, an event directly linked to the pressures of the patronage system. Charles J. Guiteau, the assassin, was a disgruntled office seeker who felt he had not been adequately rewarded for his support of Garfield's campaign. This tragedy exposed the vulnerabilities and corruption inherent in a system where government jobs were distributed based on political loyalty rather than merit. Arthur, despite his own past as a beneficiary of this system, recognized the urgent need for change. He skillfully navigated the political landscape, transforming himself from a symbol of the old order into an unlikely advocate for reform. His administration's efforts led to the establishment of the Civil Service Commission, tasked with administering competitive examinations for federal positions and preventing politicians from demanding campaign contributions from officeholders. This was a profound shift, marking a move towards a professionalized bureaucracy and reducing the direct influence of political machines on day-to-day government operations.

Beyond civil service reform, Arthur also demonstrated a commitment to modernizing the U.S. Navy. Prior to his presidency, the Union’s naval power had significantly declined since the Civil War, leaving the nation ill-equipped for international trade and defense in an era of growing global competition. Arthur recognized this vulnerability and actively pushed for the construction of new, steel-hulled warships. He appointed a naval advisory board that recommended a program of modernization, which Arthur championed in his messages to Congress. While the full fruits of this naval expansion would be realized by his successors, Arthur’s administration laid the crucial groundwork. His efforts signaled a renewed awareness of America’s position on the world stage and the importance of a strong, modern navy for economic and strategic interests, a stark contrast to the isolationist tendencies that had often characterized earlier administrations.

Furthermore, Arthur’s fiscal policies also reflected a surprising pragmatism. He inherited a significant federal surplus from the policies of previous administrations, particularly the high tariffs that protected American industries. While many in his party advocated for using this surplus to further reduce taxes or increase spending on internal improvements, Arthur focused on reducing the national debt. He signed into law the Tariff Act of 1883, which made some reductions to the overly protective tariffs, though it was not as comprehensive a reform as some reformers desired. Nevertheless, this action, coupled with his support for debt reduction, demonstrated a fiscal responsibility that countered the perception of him as merely a party loyalist. His approach to the surplus helped alleviate some of the economic pressures of the time and positioned the nation for more stable financial management.

In conclusion, Chester A. Arthur’s presidency, born out of tragedy and initially met with skepticism, proved to be a period of consequential reform. His greatest achievement, the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, permanently altered the federal bureaucracy by emphasizing merit over patronage. His foresight in advocating for a modernized navy and his prudent fiscal management further contributed to his unexpected legacy. Arthur, the accidental president, transcended the expectations shaped by his political origins, leaving an indelible mark on American governance by initiating crucial steps towards a more professional, efficient, and globally aware nation.

Analysis

The essay presents a clear and well-supported thesis: Chester A. Arthur, despite being an "accidental president" with a spoilsman background, left a significant mark through his reformist agenda. The structure is logical, beginning with Arthur's unexpected rise and the prevailing skepticism, then dedicating body paragraphs to his key achievements: civil service reform, naval modernization, and fiscal responsibility. Each point is supported by specific examples, such as the Pendleton Act, the role of Guiteau's assassination, and the Tariff Act of 1883. The tone is analytical and objective, effectively presenting Arthur's actions and their impact without resorting to overly laudatory or critical language. The essay successfully refutes initial low expectations by highlighting concrete policy changes and their long-term consequences.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively highlights Arthur's reformist achievements, a deeper exploration of the political compromises involved in passing the Pendleton Act could strengthen the analysis. For instance, mentioning the Republican party's internal divisions regarding civil service reform would add nuance. Additionally, while naval modernization is discussed, quantifying the immediate impact or detailing specific ship classes commissioned under his tenure would provide more concrete evidence. A potential alternative angle could be to analyze the limitations of Arthur's reforms, acknowledging that the spoils system wasn't entirely eradicated and that opposition to reform persisted, offering a more balanced perspective on his "accidental" yet impactful presidency.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on using specific historical events and legislation as evidence for your claims, just as the Pendleton Act and Tariff Act of 1883 are used here. Avoid vague generalizations about "progress" or "change." Ensure each paragraph directly supports your thesis by detailing a specific aspect of the subject's impact. Do not simply list achievements; explain how they were significant and why they left a mark. A common mistake is to simply summarize a presidency without analyzing its lasting consequences, so be sure to connect actions to their broader historical significance.

Frequently Asked Questions

The assassination of President James A. Garfield in 1881 by Charles J. Guiteau, a disgruntled office seeker, highlighted the dangers and corruption of the patronage system, prompting calls for reform.

This act aimed to create a merit-based system for federal employment, establishing competitive examinations for government positions and preventing politicians from coercing officeholders for campaign funds.

Arthur's administration focused on modernizing the U.S. Navy, recognizing its strategic importance in an era of increasing global trade and competition, advocating for new steel-hulled warships.

Yes, Arthur showed fiscal responsibility by prioritizing the reduction of the national debt and signing the Tariff Act of 1883, which made some reductions to protective tariffs, contributing to stable financial management.