Politics & Government 754 words

Chester Arthur the Unexpected Rise of the 21st President

Sample Essay

Chester Arthur’s tenure as the 21st President of the United States, from 1881 to 1885, remains a curious chapter in American political history. Ascending to the highest office through the assassination of James A. Garfield, Arthur was a figure largely defined by his association with the spoils system and machine politics of New York. Yet, his presidency, often dismissed as a mere interregnum, saw significant legislative achievements and a surprising pivot toward reform. Arthur’s rise was not a planned trajectory toward executive leadership but rather a consequence of political maneuvering and circumstance, and his time in office, far from being a passive period, demonstrated an unexpected capacity for governance and legislative action that reshaped aspects of federal civil service.

Arthur’s political career was forged in the crucible of New York Republican politics, particularly under the patronage of Senator Roscoe Conkling. Conkling, a powerful "Stalwart" faction leader, saw Arthur as a loyal operative capable of dispensing federal jobs and patronage within New York City and state. Arthur’s early roles as Quartermaster General of New York during the Civil War and later as Collector of the Port of New York, a highly lucrative position, solidified his reputation as a skilled dispenser of political favors and a staunch defender of the spoils system. This system, where public offices were awarded to political supporters, was a cornerstone of party power in the Gilded Age. Arthur’s appointment as Vice President in 1880, alongside Garfield, was a strategic move by the Republican Party to unite its factions. The Stalwarts, led by Conkling, supported Arthur, while the more reform-minded "Half-Breeds" backed Garfield. The ticket aimed to balance these competing interests, though it ultimately placed a man deeply entwined with the old guard in line for the presidency.

Garfield’s assassination in July 1881 thrust Arthur into the presidency under the most tragic and politically charged circumstances. Initially, many observers, including reformers who had long criticized Arthur, expected little from his administration. They anticipated a continuation of the patronage-driven politics he had championed. However, Arthur surprised these critics. Perhaps influenced by the gravity of the situation or by a genuine desire to differentiate himself from his partisan past, Arthur began to demonstrate an unexpected commitment to administrative competence and even reform. His most significant legislative triumph was the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883. This landmark legislation, a direct response to public outcry over Garfield’s assassination and the perceived corruption of the spoils system, established a merit-based system for federal employment. It created the Civil Service Commission, which was tasked with administering competitive examinations for certain government positions. While initially applying to only about 10% of federal jobs, the Pendleton Act laid the groundwork for a professionalized civil service, fundamentally altering the nature of federal employment and weakening the power of party machines.

Beyond civil service reform, Arthur’s administration also tackled other pressing issues. He advocated for modernization of the U.S. Navy, a critical need given the nation’s aging fleet. His administration initiated the construction of several new steel warships, marking a significant step towards rebuilding American naval power in an era of global competition. Furthermore, Arthur oversaw the passage of the Tariff Act of 1883, which, while not a radical overhaul, did introduce some reductions in protective tariffs, reflecting a burgeoning debate about protectionism versus free trade. Arthur also signed the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882, a controversial piece of legislation that banned Chinese laborers from immigrating to the United States for ten years. While a stain on his record from a modern perspective, it reflected the prevailing anti-immigrant sentiment of the time and fulfilled a promise to West Coast politicians. Despite these legislative actions, Arthur remained a complex figure, often perceived as aloof and disengaged, a legacy of his machine politics background. Yet, his actions often contradicted this perception, revealing a more pragmatic and capable leader than many had predicted.

In conclusion, Chester Arthur’s presidency was a period of significant, and for many, unexpected, transformation. Thrust into office by tragedy, he transcended the expectations shaped by his earlier career as a political operative. His championing of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act stands as a monumental achievement, initiating a shift towards meritocracy in government that continues to shape federal employment today. While his administration also enacted policies like the Chinese Exclusion Act that are viewed critically, Arthur’s overall tenure demonstrated a surprising capacity for leadership and a willingness to enact meaningful reform, proving that the 21st President was far more than just a placeholder for a more significant political figure.

Analysis

The essay presents a clear thesis: Chester Arthur’s presidency, often dismissed, was marked by significant, unexpected legislative achievements, particularly in civil service reform. This thesis is effectively supported by a chronological and thematic structure. The introduction sets the stage, introducing Arthur’s controversial background and the context of his unexpected rise. Body paragraphs detail his New York political machine origins, his ascent to the vice presidency, and the pivotal moment of Garfield's assassination. Subsequent paragraphs then focus on his key legislative accomplishments: the Pendleton Act, naval modernization, and tariff reform, alongside a discussion of the Chinese Exclusion Act. The conclusion succinctly reiterates the thesis, emphasizing Arthur's surprising reformist impact. The use of specific examples like the Pendleton Act and the Chinese Exclusion Act provides concrete evidence. The tone is balanced, acknowledging Arthur’s problematic past while highlighting his substantive achievements, avoiding overly effusive praise or outright condemnation.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively argues for Arthur's unexpected achievements, it could explore the motivations behind his reformist turn more deeply. Was it genuine conviction, political expediency, or a reaction to public pressure and the assassination's shockwave? Further, the essay could engage more with contemporary criticisms or support for Arthur's policies, providing a richer historical context. For instance, the "Stalwart" and "Half-Breed" factions’ long-term impact on Arthur’s political survival and policy decisions could be elaborated. A deeper dive into the political climate of the Gilded Age, beyond just the spoils system, might also offer alternative angles on Arthur’s actions and their reception.

Recommendations

For students adapting this essay, ensure your thesis is specific and arguable, much like the one presented here regarding Arthur's unexpected achievements. Structure your essay logically, using clear topic sentences for each body paragraph that directly support your thesis. When providing evidence, be as concrete as possible, naming specific acts, dates, or events. Avoid vague generalizations. Maintain a balanced tone; acknowledge complexity rather than presenting a one-sided argument. Don't just describe events; analyze their significance and impact. Ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs to create a cohesive flow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Arthur was deeply involved in New York Republican politics, primarily associated with Senator Roscoe Conkling and the "Stalwart" faction, known for their support of the spoils system.

The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883 is considered his most significant achievement, establishing a merit-based system for federal employment.

He was both. His early career was defined by machine politics, but his presidency saw him enact significant reforms, surprising many observers.

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, signed by Arthur, was a federal law that prohibited all immigration of Chinese laborers for ten years, reflecting prevailing anti-immigrant sentiment.