Science & Environment 513 words

Reflections on David Foster Wallaces This Is Water

Sample Essay

David Foster Wallace’s 2005 Kenyon College commencement address, later published as "This Is Water: Some Thoughts on the Nature of the Religious and on Compassion by an Unfortunately Ordinary Young Man," is less a typical inspirational speech and more a philosophical challenge. Wallace doesn't offer easy answers or platitudes; instead, he forces his audience, and later his readers, to confront the fundamental difficulty of conscious living. His central argument is that the default setting of our minds – a self-centered, automatic perspective – is both pervasive and deeply limiting. True freedom, he suggests, lies in the conscious effort to override this default, to choose empathy and awareness, particularly in the mundane, often frustrating, moments of everyday life.

Wallace begins by illustrating the sheer ordinariness of our existence. He paints a vivid picture of a grocery store trip, a scenario so common it’s almost invisible. The frustration of a slow cashier, the annoyance of a crowded aisle – these are the experiences that reveal our innate self-absorption. He calls this the "default setting," an unconscious belief that we are the center of the universe, and that all other people and things are merely supporting characters or obstacles in our personal dramas. This default mode, he argues, leads to a life of constant irritation and alienation, trapping us in a cycle of petty grievances. The humor and relatability of these examples make his point all the more potent; we recognize ourselves in his descriptions, uncomfortable as it may be.

The radical nature of Wallace’s proposal lies in its demand for intentionality. He doesn't suggest escaping our lives or achieving some grand enlightenment. Rather, he advocates for a deliberate, conscious choice to see the world differently, especially in those moments when it feels most inconvenient. This means actively choosing to consider the perspectives of others, to recognize that the person in front of you in line might be struggling with unseen burdens, or that the traffic jam is not a personal affront but simply a consequence of shared human activity. This is the "water," the invisible, pervasive reality of our interconnectedness and the constant need for mindful attention. It requires a willingness to be uncomfortable, to suspend judgment, and to actively engage with the "boring" aspects of life with a renewed sense of compassion.

Wallace connects this conscious awareness to a form of spiritual or religious practice, though he carefully avoids any specific dogma. He implies that this deliberate choice, this act of seeing beyond the self, is a deeply meaningful and, in its own way, sacred undertaking. It’s about finding meaning not in grand gestures, but in the small, consistent choices we make throughout the day. The freedom he speaks of isn't the freedom to do whatever we want, but the freedom from our own egocentric programming. It's the ability to choose our response, to imbue the ordinary with significance, and to connect with others in a genuine, empathetic way. This is the challenge Wallace leaves us with: the continuous, difficult, but ultimately rewarding work of choosing what to worship, and how to live accordingly.

Analysis

Wallace's essay presents a compelling thesis: that the fundamental challenge of adult life is to consciously overcome our innate, self-centered "default setting" and choose empathy and awareness, particularly in mundane situations. The structure of the essay effectively builds this argument. It begins with relatable, everyday examples (grocery store lines, traffic) that resonate with the audience, illustrating the pervasiveness of the default setting. Wallace then moves to the more philosophical implications, explaining how choosing a different perspective requires deliberate effort and leads to a deeper sense of freedom. The tone is conversational and self-deprecating, which paradoxically lends authority to his message, making it feel less like a lecture and more like a shared struggle. The use of vivid, almost painfully accurate descriptions of common frustrations serves as powerful evidence for his central claim about human nature.

Key Considerations

While "This Is Water" is profoundly insightful, a potential weakness lies in its demanding nature. The constant effort required to override our default setting might seem exhausting, even overwhelming, to some readers. The essay could benefit from exploring practical strategies or acknowledging the inherent difficulty and occasional failures in maintaining this conscious awareness. Furthermore, while Wallace intentionally avoids specific religious doctrines, the spiritual undertones, though powerful, might alienate readers with secular or cynical viewpoints. Alternative angles could include exploring the neurological basis of habit and attention, or examining historical and cultural examples of societies that have emphasized communal awareness over individualistic concerns, providing a broader context for Wallace's ideas.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay's core ideas, focus on concrete examples from your own experience that illustrate the "default setting" and moments where you've consciously chosen a different perspective. Avoid abstract pronouncements about human nature; instead, show it through specific anecdotes. Don't just state Wallace's thesis; unpack it with your own interpretation and relate it to the specific context of your essay. Ensure your tone is consistent – Wallace's blend of humor and sincerity is key. A common mistake is oversimplifying the challenge; acknowledge the ongoing effort required for conscious living. Finally, don't be afraid to be personal, as Wallace himself was.

Frequently Asked Questions

It's our natural, unconscious tendency to see ourselves as the center of the universe, viewing others and events primarily in relation to our own needs and desires.

Because it liberates us from the constant frustration and alienation of self-absorption, allowing for genuine connection and a richer experience of life.

No, he uses "religious" metaphorically to describe a way of life centered on empathy and conscious choice, applicable to any belief system or none.

By making deliberate, conscious choices to consider others' perspectives, to be present in mundane moments, and to suspend immediate judgment and irritation.

Need an original paper?

This sample is for study and inspiration. Get a custom, plagiarism-free essay written for you.

Order an Original Try the AI Humanizer