DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 1 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Ethics and Criminal Justice
Professionals (graded)
Should criminal justice professionals study ethics? Why – why
not?
dq 2
Moral Judgments
(graded)
Identify and explain the elements that define
moral judgments.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 2 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Evaluate Theories of Moral
Development (graded)
Evaluate theories of moral development in
terms of their importance of resolving moral dilemmas.
dq 2
Analyze the Differences of Law &
Justice (graded)
Analyze the differences between law and
justice.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 3 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Paradigms of Law (graded)
There are three major legal paradigms. Let’s
first compare the consensus and conflict paradigms: what are the major differences
between the two?
dq 2
Ideologies & Policy Making
(graded)
There are two major ideologies that guide
criminal justice policy making. What are the major differences between them as
they related to criminal justice?
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 4 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Elements of Law Enforcement Power
(graded)
For our first topic let’s focus the discussing
of the elements of law enforcement power. What are they? Provide an example of
each one that you mention.
dq 2
Types of Law Enforcement Corruption
(graded)
Our second topic will focus on types of law
enforcement corruption. List, analyze, and discuss them.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 5 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Discuss Prosecutorial Interest
Conflicts (graded)
Discuss the major issues concerning prosecutorial
conflicts of interest.
dq 2
Adversarial Relationships: DA v.
Defense (graded)
Discuss the adversarial relationships between
the defense attorney and the prosecutor in the adjudication process.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 6 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Institutional & Community
Corrections (graded)
Institution and community corrections are the
primary methods used in America; describe and discuss the related ethical
issues in these systems.
dq 2
Rationales for Punishment (graded)
There are several rationales for punishment,
all of them are legitimated by social contract theory. What are the major
differences between retribution and prevention as forms of punishment?
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 7 Discussion 1 & 2
dq 1
Discuss Noble Cause Corruption (graded)
Discuss the reasons for noble cause
corruption.
dq 2
Crime Control & the War on Terror
(graded)
Discuss what you believe are the major ethical
issues in crime control and the war on terror.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 1 Website Field Trip
Website Field Trip #1
Review and study this site;
http://www.theiacp.org/ and find the section on ethics, write a short report on
your findings and answer the following questions:
1. Who sponsors this site?
2. What is the purpose of this site?
3. How does this site relate to CJ and ethics
and this course?
4. What are some of the new and interesting
facts that you learned from this site?
5. Does this site have anything for CJ
students?
Submit your findings by using the drop box.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 2 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week
two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer-cise using the following
format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment
you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem
the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor
keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that
apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s)
that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work
through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your
judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law enforcement
officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to seek justice
(same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the officer thought
the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and act-utilitarianism). One
of the principles of due process and our system of advocacy is that the defense
attorney has a right of access to exculpatory information – the prosecutor is
both legally and ethically bound to provide such information to the defense.
The police officer, as a participant in the justice process, has a
complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when
solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have ques-tions ask your
instructor.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 3 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week
two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer-cise using the following
format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment
you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem
the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor
keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that
apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s)
that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work
through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your
judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law
enforcement officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to
seek justice (same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the
officer thought the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and
act-utilitarianism). One of the principles of due process and our system of
advocacy is that the defense attorney has a right of access to exculpatory
information – the prosecutor is both legally and ethically bound to provide
such information to the defense. The police officer, as a participant in the
justice process, has a complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when
solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have ques-tions ask your
instructor.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 5 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week
two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer-cise using the following
format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment
you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem
the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor
keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that
apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s)
that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work
through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law
enforcement officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to
seek justice (same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the
officer thought the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and
act-utilitarianism). One of the principles of due process and our system of
advocacy is that the defense attorney has a right of access to exculpatory
information – the prosecutor is both legally and ethically bound to provide such
information to the defense. The police officer, as a participant in the justice
process, has a complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when
solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have ques-tions ask your
instructor.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 6 Website Field Trip
Website Field Trip #2
Review and study this site; www.abanet.org and
find the section on ethics, write a short report on your findings and answer
the following questions:
1. Who sponsors this site?
2. What is the purpose of this site?
3. How does this site relate to CJ and ethics
and this course?
4. What are some of the new and interesting
facts that you learned from this site?
5. Does this site have anything for CJ
students?
Submit your findings by using the drop box.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 6 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week
two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer-cise using the following
format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment
you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem
the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor
keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that
apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s)
that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work
through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your
judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law
enforcement officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to
seek justice (same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the
officer thought the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and
act-utilitarianism). One of the principles of due process and our system of
advocacy is that the defense attorney has a right of access to exculpatory
information – the prosecutor is both legally and ethically bound to provide
such information to the defense. The police officer, as a participant in the justice
process, has a complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when
solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have ques-tions ask your
instructor.
DeVry
CRMJ425 Week 7 Ethical Dilemma
Ethical Dilemma Exercise Instructions
Using the information in chapter two and week
two’s lecture solve this week’s ethical dilemmas exer-cise using the following
format:
Ethical Judgment: Here you state the judgment
you have made about the ethical dilemma; that is you state the action you deem
the best action to take in this case.
For example:
Tell the prosecutor and if the prosecutor
keeps the information from the defense attorney, you should provide it.
Moral Rules: Here you list the rules that
apply to support the judgment you have made.
For example:
One should seek justice.
One should protect due process.
One should do one’s duty.
One should not lie.
One should strive to protect the innocent.
Ethical System: Here you list the system(s)
that would support your judgment. Perhaps a paradigm to follow is to work
through the systems and first list the ones that would not support your
judgment.
For example:
Ethical formalism would define a law enforcement
officer’s duty as not just telling the truth on the stand, but to seek justice
(same for the prosecutor). It makes no different whether the officer thought
the defendant was guilty or not (except for egoism and act-utilitarianism). One
of the principles of due process and our system of advocacy is that the defense
attorney has a right of access to exculpatory information – the prosecutor is
both legally and ethically bound to provide such information to the defense.
The police officer, as a participant in the justice process, has a
complementary duty.
This is the format you need to follow when
solving the assigned ethical dilemmas, if you have ques-tions ask your
instructor.DeVry CRMJ425 Week 4 Midterm3. Question :TCO#1: The primary difference between act and rule utilitarianism is:Act utilitarianism determines the utility of each moral decision one by one, while rule utilitarianism does not.Rule utilitarianism determines the utility of each moral decision one by one, while act utilitarianism does not.Rule utilitarianism focuses on the character of the decision-maker, while act utilitarianism does not.Act utilitarianism focuses on the long-term consequences of an act, while rule utilitarianism does not.Question 9. Question :TCO#1: Ethical work decisions fall into three of the following categories; which one does not belong?Effects on citizenryEffects on selfEffects on other employeesEffects on organizationsQuestion 10. Question :TCO#1: The primary distinction between religious ethics and natural law is:That natural law demands that animals be considered part of the moral universe, while religious ethics does not.Religious ethics does not recognize an external source of morality while natural law does not.Natural law does not recognize an external source of morality while religious ethics does not.Natural law refers to no specific supernatural figures as the source of morality, while religious ethics does.Question 15. Question :TCO#1: The subcultural ethics of police are most consistent with what ethical system?Ethics of virtueEthical FormalismUtilitarianismNatural Law
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.